From US News & World Report. Not surprisingly, a spokesman for Earth Justice is quoted, but no one from the other side is. Earth Justice criticizes the guidance for not adequately fixing the "broken" Clean Water Act, but it's a little unclear how the agencies can make a legislative fix through issuing a nonbinding interpretation of a judicial opinion.
PLF's Rapanos page
Articles About Rapanos
- Comment on Rapanos - by Reed Hopper
- Supreme Clean Water Day by Jonathan H. Adler
- On the Clean Water Act: Three That Got Away by James J. Kilpatrick
- Clean Water Act's Ever-Expanding Reach by Shikha Dalmia
- The Shifting Sands of the Clean Water Act, by Gregory T. Broderick
- How 'Wetlands' Bureaucrats Crush Property Rights by M. David Stirling
- Bush Administration Puts Environmentalists Before The Law by Gregory Broderick
Panel Discussion
U.S. Supreme Court
« New Rapanos Guidance | Main | Troubling Rapanos Commentary from the Academy »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8349fff5f69e2010536324ff7970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Commentary on Revised Rapanos Guidance:
Pacific Legal Foundation
Decisions
Questions Presented
Merits briefs
Amicus Briefs
Oral Argument Transcript
Recent Posts
- Senate Committee passes Clean Water Restoration Act on party-line vote
- Is the Clean Water Restoration Act Constitutional?
- More "Marks meets Rapanos" commentary
- Professor Adler's Commentary on Cundiff
- Post-Rapanos decision in Cundiff
- Non-navigable river Blues
- Op ed on the Rapanos settlement
- Coverage on the Rapanos Settlement
- More on the LA River
- Leftist Hyperbole
